AntAC Newsletter

Dear friends!

Your are interested in Ukraine and willing to follow the most recent anti-corruption developments in the country?

Then subscribe to our regular (weekly) updates.

We are covering:

1. The most burning successes and challenges of the anti-corruption reform in Ukraine

2. State of implementation by Ukraine of international obligations and commitments in the area of the anti-corruption

3. The most crucial and fresh cases of corruption investigations and revelations from journalists and law enforcement agencies of Ukraine

More news and publications in English are available at our webpage; the most recent and burning anti-corruption news in English we tweet here.

Yours, Anti-corruption Action Centre

  1. Subscribe to our weekly updates

Holding those responsible for syphoning money from procurements.

Watchdogging for public procurement of drugs.

Map Ukrainian Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs)

Foreign partners condition Ukraine to fight corruption. We are monitoring how Ukraine implements these obligations.

Exploring corruption and learn to fight it.

Helping to return the money stolen by corrupt officials back to Ukraine.

The Supreme Court illegally refused to commence proceeding following activists’ lawsuit against Poroshenko

The Supreme Court of Ukraine refused to commence proceedings following  activists’ lawsuit against the President Petro Poroshenko concerning the illegal appointment of Pavlo Zhebrivsky as NABU auditor. Activists will appeal the decision as the grounds for refusal are illegal.

The Supreme Court did not want to consider the case and instead of deciding to open the proceeding, it immediately decided that the activists had no right to go to court to appeal the Presidential Decree.

The court referred that the case can not be considered in the administrative court, but in violation of part 6, article 170 of the Code did not specify to which court the appeal should be sent.

“The refusal to commence proceeding is a flagrant violation of both Ukrainian and international law and may indicate political dependence. The Anti-Corruption Action Centre will appeal  this decision first in Ukrainian court, and, if necessary, in European Court of Human Rights,” said Vitaliy Tsokur,  lawyer at the Anti-Corruption Action Centre.

“It testifies the lack of a fair judiciary, which is quite symbolic in a lawsuit against the President, who considers judicial reform as one of his main achievements,” the lawyer adds.

Recalling the fact that on June 27, the Anti-Corruption Action Centre, Transparency International Ukraine and AvtoMaydan sued the President Petro Poroshenko due to the violation of the law and appointment of Pavlo Zhebrivsky as NABU auditor.

The activists demand to dismiss Zhebrivsky from the post of NABU auditor by canceling the Presidential Decree. The reason is lack of work experience of Zhebrivsky in law enforcement or judicial authorities abroad or in international organizations, as required by law.

According to Article 26 of the Law “On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau”, NABU auditor must have experience in foreign pre-trial investigation authorities, prosecution, courts or international organizations. Pavlo Zhebrivsky, according to his official biography, does not have such experience. Later he confirmed it to journalists.

Poroshenko signed the Decree on the appointment of Zhebrivsky as an auditor of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine on June 19.

According to media reports, Zhebrivsky is a longtime associate of Petro Poroshenko. In the early 2000s, Pavlo Zhebrivsky became the first Deputy of current President in “Solidarnist” party. Obviously, it also allowed him to head Zhytomyr Oblast State Administration in April 2005 and become the head of the department of the General Prosecutor’s Office in 2015.