The Supreme Court wants to bury the judicial reform with the CCU’s help

Today, on October 8, the Plenum of the Supreme Court considered the appeal of the High Council of Justice regarding unconstitutionality of the judicial reform.  Judges of the Supreme Court (SC) decided to appeal to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (CCU). This means the beginning of the abolition of the judicial reform. 

The appeal was supported by 129 judges of the Supreme Court, and only 15 judges opposed. The Supreme Court wants the Constitutional Court to declare provisions of the law regarding the reform of the HCJ unconstitutional. In particular, in the appeal judges oppose: 

  1. suspension of members of the HCJ who according to the assessment of the Ethics Council do not meet the criteria of integrity;
  2. evaluation of members of the HCJ who are judges and have previously passed the qualification evaluation;
  3. dismissal of current members of the High Council of Justice;
  4. the decision-making procedure of the Ethics Council.

The fact is that judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine cannot independently declare certain law unconstitutional. That is why the judicial mafia decided to send the appeal to the CCU through the Supreme Court to stop the judicial reform that has recently begun.

“There are several influential groups of judges in the Supreme Court who actually run the whole system. For years they have been appointing their people to the HCJ and in such way they controlled the system. For them the creation of the Ethics Council means loss of control over the appointment of members of the HCJ, and thus inability to influence careers of loyal judges and punish disloyal ones. It seems that without changes to the law on the judicial reform, the judicial mafia will not allow implementing the reform. Moreover, some judges have primitive interests to retire, and for this, they need the HCJ that works”, AntAC’s expert Halyna Chyzhyk commented.

For instance, when judges want to retire, they need the decision of the HCJ, which must provide a positive opinion. In the case of work of the Ethics Council, which will clean the HCJ, there may be situations when this body will not work for some time.  It is obvious that this does not suit the current judicial system, which may lose control due to the reform.

“The CCU is undoubtedly ready to destroy this judicial reform. It was just waiting for a formal appeal from the Supreme Court. After all, Zelenskyi’s first attempt to reform the judicial system was cancelled there one year and a half ago. Later, the CCU destroyed the electronic declaration of officials, in particular, in the interests of judges. The judicial mafia will do everything to avoid changes and cleansing. Everyone who votes in favour of the appeal to the Constitutional Court is playing in their interests, but not in interests of ordinary judges. All attempts to sabotage the judicial reform ended with the reform intensified and radicalized form of reform. It will be the same this time as well”, Chairman of the Board of the DEJURE Foundation Mykhaylo Zhernakov adds.

We should recall that members of the Council of Judges refused to delegate their representatives to the Ethics Council, which has to examine integrity of candidates and members of the HCJ. In other words, the Council of Judges sabotaged the judicial reform and won time for the Supreme Court to send the appeal to the CCU regarding unconstitutionality of the reform.  

In July 2021, the Verkhovna Rada voted in favour of the judicial reform, where it provided for the crucial role of international experts in the process. 

Last month, international organizations that assist Ukraine in the field of judicial reform and anti-corruption delegated experts to the Competition Commission that will select members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges and the Ethics Council to clean up the High Council of Justice. The delegated experts are the elite of judicial and legal systems of the USA and the EU. For instance: judges of the Supreme Courts of the largest US states, the Prosecutor General of Estonia and the largest federal state of Germany, the Minister of Justice and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Slovenia.

In October 2019, the Verkhovna Rada voted in favour of the judicial reform, where international experts should have also taken part. This was the first attempt of President Zelenskyi and the Servants of the People to conduct judicial reform. However, the High Council of Justice blocked it at that time by its provisions and levelled the role of international experts. It was expected that at that time international experts refused to legitimize their participation in this so-called competition and did not nominate experts to the Competition Commission before the deadline. Later, the CCU made the decision on its unconstitutionality, by which it finally buried the chance for the reform.

Share the news

Also read

All news
Case of Rotterdam +. HACC’s decision, which may cost Ukrainians UAH 40 bln
CSOs call on President to veto amendments to the law on party financing
MPs can still spend budget funds and do not report. Should COVID-19 still be blamed for this?

Also read

All news
Threat from the Constitutional Court, relaunch of the HCJ and dismissal of dishonest members: what to expect from judicial reform in Ukraine
The composition of the Ethics Council, which will clean up the High Council of Justice, is known
The Parliament tries to solve the problem of KDAC with the help of useless draft law

subscription

Get the AntAC's news first
By filling in this form, I agree to the terms&conditions Privacy Policy