CSO’s statement on new law reinstating criminal liability for false declarations

On December 4, Ukrainian Parliament has adopted  law #4460-d aimed to restore criminal liability for false statements in asset declarations. Speaker Razumkov explained that this was the compromise reached by all parliamentarian factions in order to repair damages to the assets disclosure system following the decision of the Constitutional Court. 

However, the adopted legislation compromises the system of asset disclosure and significantly weakens criminal liability comparing to the legal framework established in 2014-2016. The latter was positively supported by civil society and key international partners, including the EU and IMF. 

Head of National Corruption Prevention Agency calls president Zelenskyi to veto the draft law #4460-d, as it does not envision imprisonment as a sanction for failure to submit asset declaration or submitting intentionally false statements.

Until Constitutional Court decision on October 27, 2020, it was a crime to submit an intentionally false statement to asset declarations about assets worth 500 000 UAH (approx $17 000). The criminal code envisioned either fine of 42 500 – 51 000 UAH (approx $2 000), or public works for 150-240 hours, or imprisonment for up to 2 years for such a crime depending on the severity of the offence. 

By adopting draft law #4460-d, the parliament failed to introduce imprisonment for submitting intentionally false statements to asset disclosure forms and increased a monetary threshold for the crime from 500 000 UAH to 1 000 000 UAH (approx $35 000). For false statement in declaration from 1 000 000 UAH to 9 000 000 UAH  (approx $318 000) a new article of the Criminal Code foresees a fine from 42 500 UAH to 51 000 UAH (approx $2000) or public works from 150 to 240 hours with the possibility of deprivation of right to hold certain positions. If the difference between real and declared information exceeds  9 000 000 UAH, the fine is increased from 51 000 UAH to 85 000 UAH (approx $3000),  public works or restriction of liberty up to 2 years are foreseen.

Instead of imprisonment parliament introduced the sanction of “restriction of liberty”, which has limited enforcement on practice and is about to be changed for probation procedures under the upcoming criminal justice reform foreseen for the next months.   Restriction of liberty is a soft type of sanction. It means serving a sentence in special correctional centres without isolation from society and may be lifted after six months of serving the term. 

New provision of the Criminal Code also has a shorter statute of limitation of two years. It  means that law enforcement authority and court will have a shorter period for investigation and trial for false statements in asset declarations with threshold from 1 till 9 mln UAH, which will complicate the investigation of top corruption cases, especially if undeclared assets are in foreign jurisdictions.

The adopted provisions fail to impose deteriorative and dissuasive effect for non-submission asset declarations or provide false information. Thus, the system of asset declarations will lose public trust and reliability. In the case of top-level corruption such provisions will only encourage impunity. With such weak sanctions for false statements in declarations, it will be more difficult to receive a full picture on assets of any officials and to reveal the crime of illicit enrichment through analysis of asset declarations. For public officials it would be much easier to hide assets with the low risk to be liable for that or to have soft punishment rather than to show all the assets and to allow identification of illicit enrichment or unexplained wealth with more severe sanctions.

Anti-Corruption Research and Educational Centre NaUKMA

AllUkrainian Association Automaidan

Centre for Economic Strategy 

Chesno Movement

Kharkiv Anticorruption Center

Anticorruption Action Centre

DEJURE Foundation

Transparency International Ukraine

Institute of Legislative Ideas

Bihus.info team (Kantselyarsʹka sotnya, NGO “TOM 14”)

NGO StateWatch

Share the news

Also read

All news
Why there are still no final verdicts in cases of Martynenko, Nasirov, Trukhanov. How to fix this?

subscription

Get the AntAC's news first
By filling in this form, I agree to the terms&conditions Privacy Policy